ThAct: The New Poets, Three Prose Writers & Conclusion

Blog is given by Prakruti ma'am

1) Critical Note on Night of the Scorpion by Nissim Ezekiel

Introduction

Nissim Ezekiel (1924–2004) is often regarded as the father of modern Indian English poetry. His works reflect urban sensibility, irony, and a deep engagement with Indian social and cultural realities. Among his poems, Night of the Scorpion remains one of the most widely studied because of its vivid narrative, realistic detail, and exploration of Indian rural life. The poem is significant as it combines personal memory with a larger cultural critique, presenting the clash between superstition and rationality in a rural setting.

Summary of the Poem

The poem recalls an incident from the poet’s childhood when his mother was bitten by a scorpion. The scorpion disappears into the dark, while villagers rush to the scene, chanting prayers, whispering superstitious beliefs, and trying to ward off evil. The father, a rationalist, experiments with powders, herbs, and scientific remedies. After twenty hours of suffering, the mother recovers, uttering only a simple line of gratitude that her children were spared.

Critical Analysis

Theme of Superstition and Rationality

One of the central tensions in the poem is the contrast between superstition and rational thought. The villagers believe that the scorpion’s movements directly affect the intensity of the poison, saying “with every movement the poison moves in mother’s blood.” Their rituals of chanting, holy flames, and blessings reflect an age-old faith in tradition. In contrast, the father, educated and rational, relies on medicine and logical attempts to cure his wife. Ezekiel presents both approaches without mockery, highlighting how cultural practices coexist with modern science in Indian society.

Depiction of Indian Rural Life

Ezekiel’s imagery captures the essence of rural India—the mud walls, lantern light, buzzing peasants, and prayers. The arrival of the villagers and their collective response reflects the communal nature of Indian life. This realistic portrayal makes the poem more than a personal memory; it becomes a representation of Indian ethos and belief systems.

Use of Narrative Technique

The poem is written in free verse and adopts a conversational tone. It is narrated from the perspective of a child who witnesses the chaos. The absence of rigid rhyme or meter reflects the rawness of the situation. The narrative technique makes the poem read like a short story in verse, rich in detail and emotional intensity.

Irony and Human Endurance

The irony of the poem lies in the final line, where the mother, after prolonged suffering, expresses relief that her children were unharmed. Her selflessness contrasts with the villagers’ superstitions and the father’s rational experiments. Through this, Ezekiel highlights human endurance, maternal sacrifice, and the simplicity of true faith in contrast to both science and ritual.

Language and Imagery

Ezekiel’s language is straightforward, yet his imagery is powerful. Phrases like “giant scorpion shadows,” “mud-baked walls,” and “holy man performing rites” create a vivid sensory experience. The blending of Indian rural details with English free verse demonstrates his ability to Indianize English poetry while maintaining universality.

Conclusion

Night of the Scorpion is a quintessential Ezekiel poem, balancing irony, realism, and cultural observation. It moves beyond a personal childhood memory to become a commentary on Indian life, where superstition, rationalism, and deep human compassion coexist. The poem demonstrates Ezekiel’s strength in combining autobiographical detail with broader cultural critique, making him a central figure in Indian English poetry. Ultimately, the poem is not just about a scorpion sting but about human responses to suffering, the endurance of the mother, and the complex weave of faith and reason in Indian society.

2) Critical Note on Kamala Das’ An Introduction

Introduction

Kamala Das (1934–2009), one of the most powerful voices in Indian English poetry, is celebrated for her bold articulation of female identity, desire, and agency. Her confessional style challenged the patriarchal and conservative framework of Indian society, bringing a distinctly personal yet universal voice to modern Indian literature. Among her most famous works, An Introduction, from her first collection Summer in Calcutta (1965), stands out as an autobiographical and poetic manifesto. The poem not only reveals her individual struggles but also serves as a collective cry for women’s liberation and authenticity in expression.

At the heart of An Introduction lies the poet’s attempt to define herself against rigid social, linguistic, and gendered boundaries. She begins with a political reference, mentioning the newly elected men in power, to show how the public sphere is dominated by male authority. This immediately frames her personal narrative within the broader discourse of patriarchy. She then moves to language, a central theme in the poem. Das asserts her right to write in English, a language often criticized as alien and colonial, but which for her becomes a medium of self-expression. By declaring, “The language I speak / Becomes mine,” she claims ownership of English, reshaping it into an instrument of her identity and experience.

The poem also delves into issues of womanhood and sexuality. Kamala Das candidly expresses her biological changes, marriage, and sexual desires—subjects often silenced in Indian tradition. She challenges social expectations that confine women to submissive roles, arguing that the female body and its passions are not shameful but integral to individuality. Her confessional tone, influenced by poets like Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton, breaks conventions by speaking the unspeakable in a conservative society.

A striking aspect of the poem is its exploration of identity beyond gender binaries. Das confesses her desire to transcend labels of “man” or “woman” and asserts the right to exist as a human being, independent of restrictive categories. In this way, the poem anticipates later feminist discourses on fluidity of identity and the critique of essentialist notions of gender.

Formally, the poem employs free verse, reflecting the freedom she claims in content. The lack of rhyme and fixed structure symbolizes resistance against rigid poetic traditions, just as her themes resist rigid cultural norms. The conversational style makes the poem intimate and direct, drawing readers into her confession while simultaneously making it a universal statement.

Conclusion

Kamala Das’ An Introduction is more than a personal confession—it is a declaration of selfhood, resistance, and empowerment. By addressing issues of language, politics, sexuality, and identity, she dismantles patriarchal expectations and asserts her right to speak in her own voice. The poem remains a landmark in Indian English poetry for its raw honesty and courage, placing Kamala Das in the lineage of global confessional poets while also situating her firmly in the Indian feminist literary tradition. For students and critics alike, An Introduction continues to resonate as both a deeply personal narrative and a universal feminist statement, affirming the power of poetry as a vehicle for truth and liberation.

3) S. Radhakrishnan’s Perspective on Hinduism

Introduction

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888–1975), philosopher, statesman, and India’s second President, occupies a central place in modern interpretations of Hinduism. His writings, including The Hindu View of Life and Indian Philosophy, sought to present Hinduism not merely as a religion of rituals, but as a profound philosophical system with universal significance. Radhakrishnan’s interpretation of Hinduism was both scholarly and apologetic, as he aimed to respond to Western critiques while also revitalizing Hindu thought for a modern audience. His perspective emphasizes the spiritual universality, tolerance, and philosophical depth inherent in Hinduism.

Body

Radhakrishnan’s first concern was to correct misconceptions about Hinduism. Under colonial and missionary discourse, Hinduism was often portrayed as superstitious, fatalistic, and fragmented. Radhakrishnan argued instead that at its core, Hinduism represents a highly evolved spiritual vision. He interpreted it as a dynamic and inclusive system, capable of accommodating diversity while maintaining an inner unity.

A central feature of Radhakrishnan’s perspective was his emphasis on the Upanishadic vision of reality. He saw the Upanishads as the philosophical foundation of Hinduism, presenting the doctrine of Brahman (ultimate reality) and Atman (self). For him, Hinduism is not bound by dogma but is essentially a quest for truth and self-realization. The experience of unity between Atman and Brahman becomes the ultimate goal of human life, and all Hindu practices, myths, and rituals must be understood in this spiritual light.

Another important aspect of his interpretation was the universality of Hinduism. Radhakrishnan stressed that Hinduism does not claim exclusivity but embraces truth in multiple forms. This quality of tolerance and pluralism, he argued, makes Hinduism especially relevant in the modern world, marked by intercultural encounters and religious diversity. Hinduism, for him, is not a “creed” but a “way of life,” open to reinterpretation and adaptation.

Radhakrishnan also linked Hinduism with modern philosophy. He interpreted its doctrines through the categories of Western thought—such as idealism, mysticism, and existential experience—making it accessible to an international audience. For instance, he compared the Hindu idea of the self with Western notions of spirit, and he presented karma and rebirth in rational, ethical terms rather than as mere dogma.

Furthermore, Radhakrishnan viewed Hinduism as deeply ethical and practical. Far from being escapist, it promotes dharma (righteousness) and social responsibility. He believed that Hinduism encourages spiritual freedom but also insists on moral living, compassion, and service to humanity. In this sense, it addresses both the individual’s inner growth and society’s collective well-being.

Conclusion

S. Radhakrishnan’s perspective on Hinduism combines philosophical rigor with cultural defense. By highlighting its Upanishadic roots, its tolerance, and its universal vision, he presented Hinduism as a living and dynamic tradition rather than a static or dogmatic faith. His reinterpretation helped bridge Eastern and Western thought, restoring dignity to Indian religion in the modern intellectual world. For students of philosophy and religion, Radhakrishnan’s work remains crucial in understanding Hinduism as a system that harmonizes spiritual freedom with ethical responsibility, and individual experience with universal truth.

Introduction

Indian Writing in English has a long history, beginning with the colonial encounter and evolving into one of the most significant branches of postcolonial literature. After 1947, with India’s independence, the scope and nature of Indian English writing changed dramatically. Literature became a site of negotiation between tradition and modernity, local realities and global recognition, as well as individual voices and collective identities. The post-Independence period not only expanded the thematic and stylistic dimensions of Indian English writing but also helped it gain international visibility and critical acclaim.

Body

In the decades immediately after independence, Indian English writers grappled with the newly emergent nation’s identity. Writers like R. K. Narayan and Mulk Raj Anand depicted the everyday struggles of ordinary people, highlighting social reform, rural life, and the conflicts between tradition and modernity. Raja Rao, with Kanthapura, combined myth with nationalist concerns, offering a narrative deeply rooted in Indian ethos. These writers emphasized realism and social commitment, reflecting the anxieties of a nation coming to terms with its freedom.

By the 1960s and 1970s, a new wave of poets such as Nissim Ezekiel, Kamala Das, A. K. Ramanujan, and Jayanta Mahapatra transformed Indian English poetry. They broke away from mere imitation of English models and wrote with a personal, confessional, and experimental style, exploring themes of urban alienation, identity, sexuality, and cultural hybridity. Poetry became a medium of individual expression rather than only nationalist or moral discourse.

The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a significant turning point with the rise of internationally acclaimed novelists. Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children (1981) redefined Indian English fiction with its magical realism, linguistic inventiveness, and historical engagement. His success inspired a generation of writers such as Amitav Ghosh, Shashi Tharoor, and Vikram Seth, who experimented with narrative forms and addressed both national and transnational concerns. Diasporic writers like Bharati Mukherjee, Rohinton Mistry, and Anita Desai explored questions of exile, migration, and cultural dislocation, reflecting India’s growing global presence.

Women writers in particular emerged as powerful voices, challenging patriarchal narratives. Kamala Das in poetry, Anita Desai and Shashi Deshpande in fiction, and later Arundhati Roy with The God of Small Things (1997), foregrounded issues of gender, family, and personal freedom. Their works gave Indian English writing a distinctly feminist dimension.

In the twenty-first century, Indian English writing has expanded into multiple genres, including crime fiction (Vikram Chandra), speculative fiction (Samit Basu), and global bestsellers (Chetan Bhagat, Aravind Adiga). Writers address contemporary concerns such as globalization, caste politics, communal tensions, environmental crises, and LGBTQ+ identities. The international recognition of writers like Arundhati Roy, Aravind Adiga, and Jhumpa Lahiri has established Indian English literature as a vibrant and influential part of world literature.

Conclusion

Post-Independence Indian Writing in English has undergone a remarkable transformation, moving from nationalist realism to postmodern experimentation and global recognition. From the village narratives of R. K. Narayan to the magical realism of Rushdie, from the confessional poetry of Kamala Das to the feminist critiques of Arundhati Roy, the literature reflects India’s cultural diversity and historical shifts. The changing trends demonstrate a movement from local social concerns to cosmopolitan and transnational issues, affirming Indian English writing as a dynamic, evolving, and globally significant tradition.

4) The Function of Philosophy According to Radhakrishnan

Introduction

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888–1975), an eminent philosopher and statesman, occupies a central position in modern Indian thought. Deeply rooted in the Indian philosophical tradition while also engaging with Western intellectual currents, Radhakrishnan sought to bridge cultural and philosophical divides. His reflections on the function of philosophy reveal his attempt to recover the spiritual and practical dimensions of Indian philosophy while situating it in a global context. For Radhakrishnan, philosophy is not merely an abstract or intellectual exercise; it is a living pursuit that shapes human existence, ethical orientation, and spiritual awareness.

Philosophy as the Search for Truth

According to Radhakrishnan, the primary function of philosophy is the search for truth. However, unlike a purely logical or speculative endeavor, philosophy for him involves an experiential grasp of reality. He emphasizes that truth cannot be confined to intellectual propositions alone; it is ultimately realized in lived experience. In this sense, philosophy becomes a quest for knowledge that integrates reason, intuition, and spiritual insight.

Philosophy and Self-Realization

For Radhakrishnan, philosophy’s function extends beyond abstract thought to the transformation of the individual. He insists that philosophy should guide individuals towards self-realization, which in Indian tradition means recognizing the unity between the self (Atman) and the ultimate reality (Brahman). Thus, philosophy is not just about interpreting the world but also about deepening one’s consciousness and attaining liberation (moksha). This makes philosophy both a theoretical and practical discipline.

Philosophy as a Guide to Life

Radhakrishnan consistently resisted the reduction of philosophy to a “mere intellectual pastime.” Instead, he argued that philosophy has a practical and ethical function—it provides a vision of life that shapes moral values and guides human conduct. In his view, philosophy should help individuals confront problems of existence, such as suffering, injustice, and moral confusion, by offering a comprehensive worldview. This harmonizes with his idea that philosophy should not only satisfy intellectual curiosity but also provide spiritual orientation and meaning to life.

Philosophy as Synthesis

Another important function of philosophy for Radhakrishnan is synthesis. He believed that philosophy must reconcile different domains of human knowledge—science, religion, ethics, and art—into a unified whole. He particularly emphasized the need for Indian philosophy to dialogue with Western thought, not by imitating it but by integrating insights and expanding human understanding. Thus, philosophy performs the function of building bridges across cultures and traditions, fostering both intellectual and spiritual unity.

Philosophy as Spiritual Freedom

Radhakrishnan also highlights the liberating function of philosophy. By cultivating critical reflection and inner awareness, philosophy frees individuals from dogma, superstition, and narrowness. It opens the way to spiritual freedom, where individuals transcend limiting identities and realize their participation in the universal spirit. In this sense, philosophy is both emancipatory and transformative.

Conclusion

For Radhakrishnan, philosophy is not a remote or abstract discipline but a vital force that shapes human destiny. Its function lies in the pursuit of truth, the realization of self, the guidance of ethical life, the synthesis of knowledge, and the liberation of the spirit. He restores philosophy to its original Indian conception as a way of life (darśana), a vision that integrates knowledge and being. In this way, Radhakrishnan redefines philosophy not merely as intellectual speculation but as a dynamic process of self-discovery and spiritual fulfillment. His approach reminds us that philosophy, at its highest function, is the quest to live truthfully and meaningfully.

5) Change is easy, and as dangerous as it is easy; but stagnation is no less dangerous.”  Write a note on Raghunathan’s views of changes which are required the educational/academic and political contexts.

Introduction

The observation, “Change is easy, and as dangerous as it is easy; but stagnation is no less dangerous,” captures the paradoxical relationship between continuity and transformation in society. Raghunathan, as a thinker concerned with institutional reform and human behaviour, highlights the complex dynamics of change, especially within the educational and political spheres. His reflections reveal that while change is necessary for progress, it must be thoughtful and grounded, otherwise it risks instability. At the same time, the refusal to change—or stagnation—creates rigidity that suffocates growth. Thus, Raghunathan advocates for balanced reform, particularly in education and politics, where the stakes involve shaping collective consciousness and governance.

Change in the Educational/Academic Context

Raghunathan emphasizes that the academic world, especially in a developing society, cannot remain static. Education must respond to the changing needs of individuals, industries, and democratic societies. The danger of stagnation in this context is evident: rigid curricula, outdated pedagogies, and an overemphasis on rote learning create citizens ill-prepared for critical thinking or creative problem-solving. He critiques systems that valorize conformity and discourage questioning, as they hinder intellectual independence.

At the same time, Raghunathan cautions against uncritical or sudden change in education. The easy adoption of superficial reforms—such as a blind embrace of technology, or the mechanical imitation of Western models—may appear progressive but often fails to engage with the deeper structural issues of inequality, access, and relevance. For him, meaningful change requires careful balancing: preserving cultural and intellectual traditions while fostering adaptability, innovation, and inclusivity. The academic sphere, in his view, must nurture both knowledge and the ethical responsibility of learners to participate in society critically.

Change in the Political Context

In politics, Raghunathan sees a similar dual danger in uncritical change and in stagnation. Political systems must evolve with the aspirations of the people, addressing issues of justice, representation, and accountability. Stagnation in politics—where outdated laws, rigid bureaucracies, or entrenched elites dominate—creates alienation and cynicism among citizens. It prevents responsiveness to contemporary challenges such as globalization, climate change, or social diversity.

Yet, political change without stability is equally problematic. Sudden upheavals, radical shifts without consensus, or populist experiments often destabilize governance and weaken democratic institutions. Raghunathan’s view stresses that political reform should be incremental, participatory, and grounded in long-term vision rather than short-term gain. Change must empower citizens, strengthen democratic values, and ensure fairness, rather than merely reshuffling power.

Conclusion

Raghunathan’s reflections on change highlight the tension between transformation and continuity. Both education and politics, as core institutions of social life, must avoid the dangers of stagnation while also resisting reckless change. His views emphasize the importance of balance: reforms must be thoughtful, inclusive, and sustainable, not merely cosmetic or reactionary. By situating change within ethical and practical frameworks, Raghunathan reminds us that progress is not a simple act of replacing the old with the new, but a careful negotiation between tradition, innovation, and responsibility. For students and policymakers alike, his perspective underscores that the true challenge of change lies in shaping it wisely rather than resisting or embracing it blindly.

6) Write a note on the changing trends in Post-Independence Indian Writing in English

Introduction

Indian Writing in English has a long history, beginning with the colonial encounter and evolving into one of the most significant branches of postcolonial literature. After 1947, with India’s independence, the scope and nature of Indian English writing changed dramatically. Literature became a site of negotiation between tradition and modernity, local realities and global recognition, as well as individual voices and collective identities. The post-Independence period not only expanded the thematic and stylistic dimensions of Indian English writing but also helped it gain international visibility and critical acclaim.

Body

In the decades immediately after independence, Indian English writers grappled with the newly emergent nation’s identity. Writers like R. K. Narayan and Mulk Raj Anand depicted the everyday struggles of ordinary people, highlighting social reform, rural life, and the conflicts between tradition and modernity. Raja Rao, with Kanthapura, combined myth with nationalist concerns, offering a narrative deeply rooted in Indian ethos. These writers emphasized realism and social commitment, reflecting the anxieties of a nation coming to terms with its freedom.

By the 1960s and 1970s, a new wave of poets such as Nissim Ezekiel, Kamala Das, A. K. Ramanujan, and Jayanta Mahapatra transformed Indian English poetry. They broke away from mere imitation of English models and wrote with a personal, confessional, and experimental style, exploring themes of urban alienation, identity, sexuality, and cultural hybridity. Poetry became a medium of individual expression rather than only nationalist or moral discourse.

The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a significant turning point with the rise of internationally acclaimed novelists. Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children (1981) redefined Indian English fiction with its magical realism, linguistic inventiveness, and historical engagement. His success inspired a generation of writers such as Amitav Ghosh, Shashi Tharoor, and Vikram Seth, who experimented with narrative forms and addressed both national and transnational concerns. Diasporic writers like Bharati Mukherjee, Rohinton Mistry, and Anita Desai explored questions of exile, migration, and cultural dislocation, reflecting India’s growing global presence.

Women writers in particular emerged as powerful voices, challenging patriarchal narratives. Kamala Das in poetry, Anita Desai and Shashi Deshpande in fiction, and later Arundhati Roy with The God of Small Things (1997), foregrounded issues of gender, family, and personal freedom. Their works gave Indian English writing a distinctly feminist dimension.

In the twenty-first century, Indian English writing has expanded into multiple genres, including crime fiction (Vikram Chandra), speculative fiction (Samit Basu), and global bestsellers (Chetan Bhagat, Aravind Adiga). Writers address contemporary concerns such as globalization, caste politics, communal tensions, environmental crises, and LGBTQ+ identities. The international recognition of writers like Arundhati Roy, Aravind Adiga, and Jhumpa Lahiri has established Indian English literature as a vibrant and influential part of world literature.

Conclusion

Post-Independence Indian Writing in English has undergone a remarkable transformation, moving from nationalist realism to postmodern experimentation and global recognition. From the village narratives of R. K. Narayan to the magical realism of Rushdie, from the confessional poetry of Kamala Das to the feminist critiques of Arundhati Roy, the literature reflects India’s cultural diversity and historical shifts. The changing trends demonstrate a movement from local social concerns to cosmopolitan and transnational issues, affirming Indian English writing as a dynamic, evolving, and globally significant tradition.